Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of Biology Ph.D. Programs"
From Philosophy of Biology Graduate Programs
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This is simply a list. Soon, though, it will be a long list. The criteria for inclusion is just that a philosophy Ph.D. program have at least one full-time faculty member who self-identifies as a philosopher of biology. The standard of evidence required to make the list is basically a faculty web page of some kind or other that lists philosophy of biology as an AOS. For the purposes of this list, History and Philosophy of Science departments count as Philosophy Departments, while | + | This is simply a list. Soon, though, it will be a long list. |
+ | |||
+ | The criteria for inclusion is just that a philosophy Ph.D. program have at least one full-time faculty member who self-identifies as a philosopher of biology. The standard of evidence required to make the list is basically a faculty web page of some kind or other that lists philosophy of biology as an AOS. For the purposes of this list, History and Philosophy of Science departments count as Philosophy Departments, while free-standing Science & Technology Studies (or Science Studies) departments don't. | ||
* [http://philosophy.duke.edu <strong>Duke University</strong>] | * [http://philosophy.duke.edu <strong>Duke University</strong>] |
Revision as of 00:44, 18 November 2014
This is simply a list. Soon, though, it will be a long list.
The criteria for inclusion is just that a philosophy Ph.D. program have at least one full-time faculty member who self-identifies as a philosopher of biology. The standard of evidence required to make the list is basically a faculty web page of some kind or other that lists philosophy of biology as an AOS. For the purposes of this list, History and Philosophy of Science departments count as Philosophy Departments, while free-standing Science & Technology Studies (or Science Studies) departments don't.
- University of Calgary
- Megan Delehanty
- Marc Ereshefsky
- C Kenneth Waters